We have discussed the subject of engine
exhaust analysis in previous posts here and here.
Drivers in Ontario, Canada
who are interested in the results of their automobile’s e-test results, will
notice some recent changes to the test parameters.
Here is a comparison between test results
on the same car between 2010 and 2014.
The test case shown in the picture is of a
large automobile with a large engine. The test results show very low emissions
because this particular vehicle has been expertly maintained.
Ontario changed its Drive Clean procedures in January 2012 to use onboard
diagnostic (OBD) testing equipment instead of tail pipe emissions. However, on
pre-OBD2 cars such as the one in the picture, the tail pipe test will still be
used.
In the 2010 example above, the test included a
Nitric Oxide (NO) test during the under-load condition. Excessive oxides of
nitrogen are generally caused by anything that makes the engine’s temperature
rise. Simply putting the engine under load by raising the RPM instead of idling
will increase the NO / NO2 output. On the 2014 test, the NO portion of the test
has been eliminated.
The CO / HC limits are also different now.
High Carbon Monoxide (CO) levels are associated with anything that causes the
air/fuel mixture to be richer, or higher in fuel, than is ideal. High
hydrocarbons (HC’s) can be caused by several conditions, most of which are
related to improper fuel combustion, such as engine misfire. Both tests in the
picture include measurements of CO / HC’s. But the limits are now the same for
the load and non-load portions of the test.
Over the years, the drive-clean programs in
various places have reportedly caused the repair or removal of most
high-emissions automobiles from the roads. The newer engines have lower
emissions in general. Also, OBD2 testing that ignores actual tail-pipe emissions
has apparently produced misleading results in some test cases. This has
prompted many to think that the whole drive-clean program has served its
purpose and should be phased out.
We have been manufacturing engine exhaust
analyzers for many years now and have definitely noticed this general trend
toward low emissions measurements in modern engines. For example, we offer a
% or ppm range for CO measurement. The
ppm range is much more common now for vehicle testing.
We frequently build instruments with the
following engine exhaust ranges:
O2: 0-25.0%
CO: 0-2,000ppm
CO2: 0-25.0%
NO: 0-2,000
HC's: 0-2,000ppm
In view of the modern downward trends, we
will no doubt develop lower range options in the near future.
For information on these and other gas
analyzer systems, give Mike or Dave at Nova a call, or send us an e-mail.
1-800-295-3771
sales at nova-gas dot com
websales at nova-gas dot com
http://www.nova-gas.com/
-